
Now the neo-cons are saying what they really mean by "surge". The AEI, one of the originators of the "surge" in a new Op-Ed redefined it as an 18 month minimum deployment.(Originally in WaPo)
The only "surge" option that makes sense is both long and large.
Clue Number 1: Northern Ireland.
Call it what you will, surge, escalation, McCain Doctrine, it's a last mad vainglorious attempt to redeem a failed policy.
And where is the rationale for going from an Iraq strategy to a Baghdad strategy? Lowered expectations? Smart military commanders had been talking about longer deployments as part of an effective political solution throughout Iraq, not as a military solution for Baghdad alone. Maybe they want to leave with a big crescendo like the end of a fireworks display and have it all on cameras panning and zooming from hotel rooms in the Green Zone.
|
|
|
Permalink :: 0 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.